Statement by Permanent Representative of Slovenia to the United Nations Samuel Žbogar at the UNSC open debate on UN peace operations, titled “The future of peace operations: key issues, opportunities and challenges in the context of the review on the future of all forms of UN peace operations”

Thank you very much Mr. President.

First, I would like to express gratitude of our delegation for the leadership and wisdom of Ambassador Alfaro de Alba of Panama during Panamanian Presidency in August. I would also like to take this opportunity to congratulate you, Mr. President, and the Republic of Korea for assuming the Presidency. I can assure you of our full cooperation and support.

I would like to thank Under-Secretary Lacroix, Under-Secretary DiCarlo as well as the Chair of the Peacebuilding Commission, and Ms. Russo for their really thought-provoking briefings and historical perspective. I would like to thank them for their commitment to peace operations as well as for bringing passion and realism for peace operations into today’s debate.

At the outset, we pay tribute to troop contributing countries and all peacekeepers for their tireless service in the cause of peace. We extend our deepest condolences to the families of those who have made the ultimate sacrifice.

I thank the Republic of Korea for recognizing the importance to once again debate this issue in an open format. We commend the leadership of the Secretary-General and Under-Secretary-General Lacroix.

Colleagues,

There are more conflicts raging around the globe than ever before. They last longer. All of that in a period when divisions in this Council, and in our international community, are running deep.

The Review on the Future of All Forms of UN Peace Operations comes hence at a critical juncture.

In times when keeping peace is more important than ever.

All changes to the current peacekeeping infrastructure need to be done cautiously and attentively.

Mr. President,

Let me elaborate this further in the three following points:

First – agility and adaptability. Peace operations must be fit for purpose.

For the sake of sustainability of the peace agreements, they cannot be imposed. If they are to be respected and in order to lead to rehabilitation and reconciliation of affected communities, they must be just and lasting, based on international law and must ensure accountability.

Mandates must be realistic, prioritized, and supported by resources adequate to meet their objectives. Protection of civilians must remain unequivocally at the core of our efforts.

At the same time, peace operations must actively support political processes, strengthen security on the ground, and evolve to meet new challenges, from climate-related insecurity to the risks posed by emerging technologies.  Investment in digital tools, early warning, AI, drones, and data analytics is not optional, it is essential for effectiveness.

Second – political primacy. No peace operation can substitute for inclusive, nationally owned political processes. Peacekeeping must be matched with diplomacy, mediation, and prevention, backed by the Secretary-General’s good offices. The Council must show unity of purpose and provide credible mandates. Inaction carries a cost and it is civilians who pay it.

In today’s world, peace operations are often the critical lifeline for communities in conflict, and essential support in maintaining peace and security in regions under strain.

Third – coherence, credibility, and sustainability. Peace operations, peacebuilding, and sustainable development must reinforce one another.

Any transitions must be carefully managed to avoid security vacuums.

The UN80 initiative should protect core capacities for rapid deployment. Credibility depends on the highest standards of conduct, accountability, and transparency. Financial sustainability is equally vital, liquidity crises must not undermine mandates or the safety of personnel.

Looking ahead, Action for Peacekeeping and A4P+ remain our compass, guiding us toward peace-centered, effective, and future-ready peace operations. Success will depend on clear objectives, ample resources, host-country legitimacy and unity within the Council.

Mr. President,

Slovenia will continue to engage constructively in this Review. We see it as an opportunity to ensure that peace operations remain a central tool of this Organization, true to the expectations of those we serve.

Finally, I reaffirm Slovenia’s unwavering commitment to multilateralism, including as both a troop and police contributor. Our engagement reflects our belief in collective action for peace, security, and human dignity. We will continue to support efforts to adapt peace operations to today’s realities and tomorrow’s challenges, with the Security Council’s leadership playing a decisive role.

Thank you.

Recent Statements