Statement by the Republic of Slovenia at the UNSC meeting on United Nations peacekeeping operations

I wish to begin by thanking France for organizing this meeting and Under Secretary General Lacroix for his briefing, as well as Lieutenant General Lázaro and Lieutenant General De Mesquita for their valuable contributions. We highly appreciate the information, the lessons learned from the ground and we are always interested in learning what are the main challenges and possible improvements. So, thank you very much again.

Mr. President,

The changing nature of conflicts, rapid advancements in technology, and quickly shifting geopolitical dynamics present unique challenges to peacekeeping. Monitoring ceasefire has been a core task of the UN peacekeeping since its earliest missions and today, it remains a central responsibility of several operations. While ceasefire monitoring could be considered a traditional task, we must ensure that it adapts effectively to new challenges and realities.

Let me highlight four points, that we believe are important when discussing future of ceasefire monitoring.

First, the role of technology – in today’s rapidly evolving operational environment, the use of emerging and advanced technologies, including AI, can play a critical role in enhancing the situational awareness, improving effectiveness of ceasefire monitoring and safety and security of peacekeeping personnel. By leveraging and incorporating new and advanced technological tools, peace operations can achieve more precise, reliable, and timely assessments of ceasefire compliance, which are vital for maintaining peace in conflict zones. In increasingly dangerous operational environment, it also helps to minimize UN personnel exposure. Combining technological tools with human expertise is essential for success. 

Second, impact of ceasefire monitoring on long-term consent: Effective ceasefire monitoring has direct impact on the long-term consent of host states and populations for peacekeeping operations. Effective, impartial, and transparent monitoring, based on a clear and well-funded mandate, builds trust and maintains legitimacy. In contrast, monitoring failures or perceived bias can quickly erode confidence and reduce support. Thus, monitoring must be credible, transparent, and inclusive.

Third, the role of all parties to the conflict and that of the host states: All parties to the conflict must effectively support ceasefire monitoring by granting full access, sharing information, and respecting monitoring independence. The host state must ensure that peacekeepers operate without interference and investigate ceasefire breaches expeditiously and transparently. All parties should be held accountable for violations and engage in discussions to improve the monitoring.

Fourth, partnership: The role of partnership is fundamental in strengthening ceasefire monitoring. Ceasefire monitoring is a task that cannot be carried out by the UN alone. By collaborating with regional organizations, local authorities and non-governmental actors, peacekeeping missions can enhance their monitoring capabilities. Partnerships enhance monitoring by making it more effective, relevant, transparent, and accountable.

Mr. President,

As the UN explores the future of peacekeeping, the ability to support and monitoring ceasefires should remain a core part. Monitoring alone will not bring peace. However, when done effectively, it can reduce tensions, build trust, and create space for political solutions. Without these, monitoring risks to become but a technical activity.

To conclude, Mr. President, we wish to thank once again the Heads of Military Components for their service, and we look forward to hearing more from their experience on the ground.

I thank you.

Recent Statements